Skip to content
Go back 2503.02950 arXiv logo

LiteWebAgent: The Open-Source Suite for VLM-Based Web-Agent Applications

Published:  at  11:12 AM
90.54 🤔

LiteWebAgent is an open-source suite for VLM-based web agents that bridges the gap in production-ready solutions by offering an extensible framework with decoupled action generation and grounding, advanced planning, memory, tree search, and practical deployments via Vercel and Chrome extension.

Vision Foundation Model, Agent, Planning, Reasoning, Human-AI Interaction, Multimodal Systems

Danqing Zhang, Balaji Rama, Jingyi Ni, Shiying He, Fu Zhao, Kunyu Chen, Arnold Chen, Junyu Cao

PathOnAI.org, Rutgers University, The University of Texas at Austin

Generated by grok-3

Background Problem

The rapid advancement of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) has transformed web browser automation, enabling sophisticated task execution on complex platforms. However, a critical gap exists in the web agent ecosystem: the lack of a production-ready, open-source solution that combines minimal serverless backend configuration with intuitive user interfaces while remaining extensible for emerging research developments like search agents and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). LiteWebAgent addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive suite for VLM-based web agent applications, focusing on practical deployment and integration of advanced agent capabilities such as planning and memory.

Method

LiteWebAgent introduces an extensible web agent framework that decouples action generation (using VLMs to produce natural language actions) from action grounding (translating actions into executable Playwright code using webpage observations like DOM or screenshots). The framework supports two agent types: FunctionCallingAgents, which use recursive function calls for action generation, and PromptAgents, which rely on few-shot prompting. It incorporates advanced components like agent planning (basic, high-level, and context-aware), Agent Workflow Memory (AWM) for informed planning, and tree search (including MCTS) to explore multiple action trajectories. The system is deployed in two formats: a Vercel-based web application for remote browser control and a Chrome extension for local browser interaction via Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP), both supported by asynchronous APIs for seamless integration.

Experiment

The paper does not present detailed experimental results or quantitative evaluations of LiteWebAgent’s performance, which is a significant limitation. Instead, it provides high-level demonstrations through system overviews and UI screenshots, showcasing the framework’s functionality in two deployed systems (Vercel-based app and Chrome extension). The experimental setup focuses on user interaction via chat interfaces and browser visualization, but lacks specifics on datasets, benchmarks (e.g., WebArena or Mind2Web), or comparative analysis against existing frameworks like SeeAct or Agent-E. There is no evidence to confirm whether the decoupled action generation and grounding, or advanced features like tree search, outperform simpler baselines or meet expectations in real-world tasks. This absence of rigorous testing raises concerns about the framework’s practical effectiveness and reliability.

Further Thoughts

While LiteWebAgent’s modular design and open-source nature are commendable, the lack of empirical validation is a critical oversight that limits confidence in its claimed contributions. Future work could explore integrating LiteWebAgent with established benchmarks like WebArena to provide concrete performance metrics, especially for tree search and planning modules. Additionally, the potential for multi-agent integration mentioned in the conclusion opens up fascinating avenues—could LiteWebAgent serve as a component in hierarchical systems where web agents collaborate with device control agents, as hinted in the introduction? This could be particularly impactful in domains like AI for Science or Robotics, where web-based data retrieval by agents could complement physical task execution. Lastly, the privacy implications of local browser control via CDP warrant deeper investigation, perhaps drawing from research in Trustworthy AI to ensure user data protection in personalized contexts.



Previous Post
Enhancing Safety Standards in Automated Systems Using Dynamic Bayesian Networks
Next Post
Thinking Out Loud: Do Reasoning Models Know When They're Right?